Read in December 2008
It was difficult to stay focused on this novel, its story and it’s characters. If I could, I would probably give this 2.5 stars rather than 3 stars, but I’ll be lenient since was a triple award winner in the 80s.
However, it really hasn’t stood the test of time well. If I had read this when published, which would have been my first year in college as an engineer/math/computer science college student, it would have been cutting edge, or more appropriately, bleeding edge.
But the character development was lost in the weird heist-like saga of these individuals thrown together by an immoral and immortal AI manipulating them and the world. It was sad that I couldn’t care what happened to them or their acquaintances or their world. Some of the action was top-notch, but much of their motivations were harsh, raw and confusing.
I can see where Hollywood has reworked this idea many times over the last two decades, most notably The Matrix and Johnny Mneumonic and a spattering of television episodes (a couple of X Files and a Lone Gunman one that I can remember off the top of my head).
One thought on “Book Review: Neuromancer by Gibson (3 Stars)”
This book seems to be a real hit and miss with people. Personally William Gibson is very high on my favourite authors of all time list. I loved all of the books in this trilogy and the next. I only read this book for the first time last year, and I still got into it somehow. As I said, tends to be really hit and miss with people 🙂
Comments are closed.